P2PE vs. E2EE: What’s the Best Payment Security Option for Governments?

Ultimately, these requirements are fairly easy for most agencies to manage, leaving more time and scarce resources to spend on the purpose and passion at the forefront of your day-to-day dealings rather than the processes behind each transaction.

The Benefits of P2PE With CSG Forte Protect

CSG Forte Protect is a PCI-validated P2PE solution securing the V400C terminal for in-person payments . CSG Forte Protect helps governments:

• Remove liability issues: Forte Protect merges processes, applications and payment devices to securely encrypt and protect data during transit from the POI terminal/device or POS system

• Protect cardholder data: Our solution has three parts—validated hardware, validated software and validated solution providers to cover payment terminals, terminal application, deployment, key management and decryption environments.

• Save time and money: With a minimal per-transaction cost, Forte Protect saves your agency PCI-related costs by reducing PCI scope. This is because the number of questions from the self-assessment questionnaire (SAQ) drops from SAQ D (329 questions) to SAQ P2P3 (33 questions).

• Fully integrate existing payment channels: Supported card input methods include tap, dip, swipe, keyed, Apple Pay, Samsung Pay and Google Pay. Your constituents’ payment experience will be seamless without you lifting a finger!

We put data security at the core of all our payment solutions, so you can rely on Forte Protect to keep constituent data safe through every payment—every time. In addition to meeting PCI standards, we’re certified for compliance with ISO 27001:2013, SSAE SOC 1 and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). Whatever your agency needs, we can help you protect constituents from data breaches.

What Is E2EE?

Many government transactions rely on E2EE, a process that involves an indirect link between the payment terminal and processing network. During this operation, the processor or a third party is expected to encrypt cardholder data (CHD) during transit.

Unfortunately, the indirect link means card present transactions—where the user swipes, dips or taps their card—are a constant area of concern. Preventing fraud at the terminal isn’t just a matter of checking who is presenting the card. You also must ensure the payment terminals themselves are secure. By intercepting POS devices or using insiders, malware loaded to a device can scrape and transfer cardholder data available in its memory.

That’s why rather than finding new ways to protect cardholder data, businesses are looking for ways to eliminate cardholder data from their environments.

E2EE and PCI Compliance

Some agencies using E2EE claim that using doing so makes adhering to PCI guidelines easier because it encrypts data throughout the entire process, but this claim isn’t entirely the case.

While this method is compliant with PCI guidance, E2EE requires intensive documentation and additional ongoing costs associated with PCI compliance. Agencies often hold the encryption keys, so merchants relying on E2EE will typically need to complete an annual PCI DSS SAQ with over 300 questions.

Even though local and regional governments are used to wearing many hats, assuming responsibility for PCI compliance may be more than many can handle. If government agencies choose to have someone else manage PCI compliance on their behalf, like processors or outside consultants, they’ll also incur the added expense of outside help.

What’s the Difference Between P2PE and E2EE?

While they are similar in nature, some of the most significant differences between P2PE and E2EE include:

• Security rules: P2PE and E2EE require different security checks on and around the payment terminal. For example, P2PE requires merchants to perform annual terminal inventory checks to ensure everything works properly.

• Control: Because the scope for PCI compliance is much smaller with P2PE, merchants have greater control over their ability to adhere to the standard. E2EE, on the other hand, contains more endpoints, making compliance more complicated.

• Liability: P2PE providers take complete liability for data breaches because they hold the keys. With E2EE, though, the merchant has control over decryption keys and can be held liable for stolen cardholder data.

Ultimately, these differences mean the best choice for most government agencies that are planning to accept credit card payments is P2PE. It makes compliance more manageable and keeps cardholder data safer than E2EE—and it’s entirely possible with a reliable provider like CSG Forte. If you want to improve your payment processing technology, consider using our solutions to secure your card transactions.

Choose P2PE Payment Solutions from CSG Forte

The numerous controls and security implemented across this entire value chain make P2PE an extremely secure encryption method—but also a high bar for providers to clear. Only a select few offer PCI-validated P2PE today, and we’re proud to be one of those few.

At CSG Forte , we know securing a stable and safe government solution can relieve the security and compliance pressures from you and your agency employees. For that reason, CSG Forte Protect was created with you in mind to give you peace of mind.

We know you have more pressing issues to worry about than transactions and payments operations. That’s why our team at CSG Forte created safe and secure payment processing solutions . Learn more about CSG Forte’s secure in-person payments processing solutions , or contact us to get started .